La Vida Leica! https://lavidaleica.com/phpBB3/ |
|
The Fujifilm X-Pro1 https://lavidaleica.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=369 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Double Negative [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
![]() Looks like an interesting camera, no doubt:
DPReview's got a nice preview of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and you can pre-order it here. |
Author: | Double Negative [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
An interesting article revealed this nugget: "DNG is broad enough to handle unusual image sensors such as Fujifilm X-Pro 1, which uses a 36-pixel pattern with more green pixels than the usual 4-pixel Bayer pattern in most cameras." |
Author: | Double Negative [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
They're previewing their upcoming M mount adapter at the CP+ show in Japan: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Double Negative [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
They've also released some 30 high-resolution sample photos from the camera as well. What's especially interesting is that they are all shot in one of the film modes; Astia, Provia and Velvia! |
Author: | Double Negative [ Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
FYI, you can pre-order it here! |
Author: | kokoshawnuff [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
I look forward to "real-world" testing, especially with the M adaptor and some good Leica glass. For someone as entrenched in film as I, it looks like this camera has potential for a fun digital option... |
Author: | jairyhunter [ Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Fujifilm X-Pro1 |
I'm selling mine. It's alright but I could never get used to the lag (maybe I'm doing it wrong). Just never felt facile and comfortable. Also, I'm all for having options, but that menu system was just too much for me. Camera body is super sexy and feels great in the hands, but the lens feels cheap, although it is pretty good. I may be stupid and crazy but I just didn't think the image quality is there. Probably because I had to shoot everything in JPGs and that ridiculous proprietary format that I never figured out (nor wanted to or tried to) how to convert into a normal DNG or other useful format. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |