kokoshawnuff wrote:
I don't know if just auto focus would cause me to change systems completely, but if I wanted to utilize some of those features that make an SLR more versatile than other cameras--like telephoto lenses, macro, good video, good auto focus, good high iso, etc--then I definitely wouldn't have any quibbles about making the switch. I understand the annoyance of manual focus, especially when shooting people wide open, but like others have mentioned...perhaps an OM-D or small DSLR would suffice in those instances when you know autofocus would be used.
And if you find yourself preferring the autofocus camera over the course of a couple months, then there's no reason not to ditch the M9 for a DSLR. I just wouldn't jump the gun on something like selling your lenses, because they could be quite difficult to find again (if you change your mind) once the M(10) starts shipping and new customers begin arising.
It's not really that the manual focus annoys me. I'm actually quite fond of my M9 and it's very pleasing when I nail a shot. I like the process and simplicity very much. Best camera/system I've ever had. It is my own inability to focus fast enough and that's all there's to it. Don't need video or advanced focus systems or any of that.. I'd be happy with a fast 1-point center only AF in a M9
But there lies a truth in your words.. I just saw one camera shop selling a used Nikon D60 for 110€ and add to that a 35/1.8 Nikon DX prime.. I should have a dslr with 50mm fov in under 300€. And in a small package.. then maybe later add the new 70-200/4 VR and I'd have tele also. Haven't really missed it, but as my daughter grows I can imagine things like kindergarden christmas plays etc where tele would be handy..
And at that price I can for sure keep my 9!
//J